<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>efwrappers Issue Tracker Rss Feed</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic</link><description>efwrappers Issue Tracker Rss Description</description><item><title>Created Unassigned: CreateDbCommand throw System.NotSupportedException [8]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>&lt;br /&gt;        protected override DbCommand CreateDbCommand&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            throw new NotSupportedException&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;edit after&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    protected override DbCommand CreateDbCommand&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        return this.WrappedConnection.CreateCommand&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>sawachikakenji</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 07:34:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Unassigned: CreateDbCommand throw System.NotSupportedException [8] 20130507073446A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly. [7]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/7</link><description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;If your solution contains some dynamic assemblies, you can get an exception&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#91;NotSupportedException&amp;#58; The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly.&amp;#93;&lt;br /&gt;   System.Reflection.Emit.InternalAssemblyBuilder.GetManifestResourceStream&amp;#40;String name&amp;#41; &amp;#43;56&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To fix this you must add the check &amp;#34;asm.IsDynamic&amp;#34; to this file&lt;br /&gt;Source&amp;#92;EFProviderWrapperToolkit&amp;#92;EntityConnectionWrapperUtils.cs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;at the line 184 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;foreach &amp;#40;Assembly asm in assembliesToConsider.Where&amp;#40;asm &amp;#61;&amp;#62; &amp;#33;IsEcmaAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; &amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;IsSystemAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; __&amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;asm.IsDynamic__&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please read this thread, to get an explanation, why it is necessary&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#91;Here&amp;#93;&amp;#40;social.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#47;Forums&amp;#47;en-US&amp;#47;adodotnetentityframework&amp;#47;thread&amp;#47;b8847ef1-be17-404a-b35f-4b693ca23c58&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for this very useful project, - it helps us really to get track of what is going wrong with sql queries on the database side.&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;Yevgeniy Fliegel&lt;br /&gt;Comments: The proposed fix worked for me.</description><author>MatteoSp</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly. [7] 20130326120314P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly. [7]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/7</link><description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;If your solution contains some dynamic assemblies, you can get an exception&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#91;NotSupportedException&amp;#58; The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly.&amp;#93;&lt;br /&gt;   System.Reflection.Emit.InternalAssemblyBuilder.GetManifestResourceStream&amp;#40;String name&amp;#41; &amp;#43;56&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To fix this you must add the check &amp;#34;asm.IsDynamic&amp;#34; to this file&lt;br /&gt;Source&amp;#92;EFProviderWrapperToolkit&amp;#92;EntityConnectionWrapperUtils.cs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;at the line 184 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;foreach &amp;#40;Assembly asm in assembliesToConsider.Where&amp;#40;asm &amp;#61;&amp;#62; &amp;#33;IsEcmaAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; &amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;IsSystemAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; __&amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;asm.IsDynamic__&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please read this thread, to get an explanation, why it is necessary&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#91;Here&amp;#93;&amp;#40;social.msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#47;Forums&amp;#47;en-US&amp;#47;adodotnetentityframework&amp;#47;thread&amp;#47;b8847ef1-be17-404a-b35f-4b693ca23c58&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for this very useful project, - it helps us really to get track of what is going wrong with sql queries on the database side.&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;Yevgeniy Fliegel&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>febus</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:11:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly. [7] 20130318031143P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Spatial Data Type Support? [6]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/6</link><description>When i use the EFTracingProvder and EF5 with a sql server table that contains a Geography datatype, i get the following error when i do a simple linq query against it.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;System.Data.ProvderIncompatibleException.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&amp;#34;The provider did not return a DbSpatialServices instance.&amp;#34;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should spatial datatypes work with EF5 and the EFTracingProvider&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Randy &lt;br /&gt;</description><author>rvandehei</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:36:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Spatial Data Type Support? [6] 20130130023632A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/1</link><description>I can get it working with the EF 4.1 Database First DbContext T4 templates by adding this constructor&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    public abstract class MyDbContext &amp;#58; DbContext&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        protected MyDbContext&amp;#40;string nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#58; base&amp;#40;EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;, true&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47; enable sql tracing&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#40;&amp;#40;IObjectContextAdapter&amp;#41; this&amp;#41;.ObjectContext.EnableTracing&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;But it doesn&amp;#39;t work with Code First because EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;&amp;#41; requires an Entity ConnectionString, not a normal ConnectionString. Is it possible to use a normal &amp;#40;non-EF&amp;#41; ConnectionString&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;efwrappers.codeplex.com&amp;#47;discussions&amp;#47;262707 for the full thread.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: This is possible, I gave my solution in the linked thread.</description><author>jrummell</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:02:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1] 20120813020215P</guid></item><item><title>Edited Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/1</link><description>I can get it working with the EF 4.1 Database First DbContext T4 templates by adding this constructor&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    public abstract class MyDbContext &amp;#58; DbContext&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        protected MyDbContext&amp;#40;string nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#58; base&amp;#40;EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;, true&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47; enable sql tracing&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#40;&amp;#40;IObjectContextAdapter&amp;#41; this&amp;#41;.ObjectContext.EnableTracing&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;But it doesn&amp;#39;t work with Code First because EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;&amp;#41; requires an Entity ConnectionString, not a normal ConnectionString. Is it possible to use a normal &amp;#40;non-EF&amp;#41; ConnectionString&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;efwrappers.codeplex.com&amp;#47;discussions&amp;#47;262707 for the full thread.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jrummell</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:02:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1] 20120813020215P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Oracle ODP.NET Support [5]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/5</link><description>I got the EFTracingProvider working with Oracle&amp;#39;s ODP.NET. Only a few minor changes to both the code base of EFTracingProvider as well as the example code were necessary to get it mostly working.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One problem remains though. Whenever I plugin the EFTracingConnection intead of a OracleConnection somehow the Entity Framework believes it&amp;#39;s talking to SQLServer and submits two queries that will in turn fail and produce ugly exceptions &amp;#40;Please see quires below&amp;#41;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m sure something in the codebase of the EFTracingProvider makes it believe it&amp;#39;ll be necessary to issue those two queries. Anyway, due to the closed source nature of the Entity Framework I find it hard to debug and identify the cause of the issue. I&amp;#39;d love to get this fixed and shared it with other devs who are working with ODP.NET &amp;#43; EF. - Any ideas&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.&amp;#41; SELECT &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#34;GroupBy1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;A1&amp;#34; AS &amp;#34;C1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;FROM &amp;#40; SELECT &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;COUNT&amp;#40;1&amp;#41; AS &amp;#34;A1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;FROM &amp;#34;dbo&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;__MigrationHistory&amp;#34; &amp;#34;Extent1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#41;  &amp;#34;GroupBy1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2.&amp;#41; SELECT &amp;#42; &lt;br /&gt;FROM &amp;#40; &lt;br /&gt;SELECT &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#34;Project1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;C1&amp;#34; AS &amp;#34;C1&amp;#34;, &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#34;Project1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;ModelHash&amp;#34; AS &amp;#34;ModelHash&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;FROM &amp;#40; SELECT &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#34;Extent1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;ModelHash&amp;#34; AS &amp;#34;ModelHash&amp;#34;, &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9; CAST&amp;#40; &amp;#34;Extent1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;Id&amp;#34; AS number&amp;#40;10,0&amp;#41;&amp;#41; AS &amp;#34;C1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;FROM &amp;#34;dbo&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;EdmMetadata&amp;#34; &amp;#34;Extent1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#41;  &amp;#34;Project1&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;ORDER BY &amp;#34;Project1&amp;#34;.&amp;#34;C1&amp;#34; DESC&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;WHERE &amp;#40;ROWNUM &amp;#60;&amp;#61; &amp;#40;1&amp;#41; &lt;br /&gt;</description><author>sourishkrout</author><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:54:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Oracle ODP.NET Support [5] 20120310015402A</guid></item><item><title>Edited Issue: Document disposing behavior [4]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/4</link><description>I just discovered a baaaaaad pitfall concerning disposing of contexts when using EFWrappers. Even if you dispose any created ObjectContexts, the connection will NOT be disposed. I checked the ObjectContext class&amp;#39; Dispose implementation, and discovered, that it will only dispose of the inner connection, if it was created by the ObjectContext itself. This only occurs when passing in a connectionString in its constructor. Since the EFWrappers require you to create a context by passing in the connection wrapper, the connection will not be disposed, when the ObjectContext is. What you must instead do is dispose of the wrapped connection yourself. This can be done by overriding the Dispose&amp;#40;bool disposing&amp;#41; method of the context&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;        protected override void Dispose&amp;#40;bool disposing&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            var con &amp;#61; this.Connection&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            base.Dispose&amp;#40;disposing&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            try&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                con.Dispose&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;            catch &amp;#40;ObjectDisposedException&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This should be documented to prevent database connection pile ups.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>coeamyd</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:11:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Issue: Document disposing behavior [4] 20111213051132P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Document disposing behavior [4]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/4</link><description>I just discovered a baaaaaad pitfall concerning disposing of contexts when using EFWrappers. Even if you dispose any created ObjectContexts, the connection will NOT be disposed. I checked the ObjectContext class&amp;#39; Dispose implementation, and discovered, that it will only dispose of the inner connection, if it was created by the ObjectContext itself. This only occurs when passing in a connectionString in its constructor. Since the EFWrappers require you to create a context by passing in the connection wrapper, the connection will not be disposed, when the ObjectContext is. What you must instead do is dispose of the wrapped connection yourself. This can be done by overriding the Dispose&amp;#40;bool disposing&amp;#41; method of the context&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;        protected override void Dispose&amp;#40;bool disposing&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            var con &amp;#61; this.Connection&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            base.Dispose&amp;#40;disposing&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            try&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                con.Dispose&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;            catch &amp;#40;ObjectDisposedException&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This should be documented to prevent database connection pile ups.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>coeamyd</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Document disposing behavior [4] 20111213051100P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Multi-threaded application support [3]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/3</link><description>To be able to use it in a multi threaded application I needed to make a simple modification to the EntityConnectionWrapperUtils.cs file. I added a static lock object at the class level &amp;#40;private static object lockObject &amp;#61; new object&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&amp;#41; and then added a lock statement around that if in the CreateEntityConnectionWithWrappers method&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            MetadataWorkspace workspace&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;            lock &amp;#40;lockObject&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;metadataWorkspaceMemorizer.TryGetValue&amp;#40;ecsb.ConnectionString, out workspace&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                    workspace &amp;#61; CreateWrappedMetadataWorkspace&amp;#40;ecsb.Metadata, wrapperProviders&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                    metadataWorkspaceMemorizer.Add&amp;#40;ecsb.ConnectionString, workspace&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you could update the NuGet package with this fix it would be awesome. Thanks&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Louis&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Note&amp;#58; This bug has been fixes already&amp;#10;&amp;#10;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;efwrappers.codeplex.com&amp;#47;SourceControl&amp;#47;changeset&amp;#47;changes&amp;#47;495320e30aa1</description><author>tamasflamich</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:05:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Multi-threaded application support [3] 20111118020524P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Multi-threaded application support [3]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/3</link><description>To be able to use it in a multi threaded application I needed to make a simple modification to the EntityConnectionWrapperUtils.cs file. I added a static lock object at the class level &amp;#40;private static object lockObject &amp;#61; new object&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&amp;#41; and then added a lock statement around that if in the CreateEntityConnectionWithWrappers method&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;            MetadataWorkspace workspace&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;            lock &amp;#40;lockObject&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                if &amp;#40;&amp;#33;metadataWorkspaceMemorizer.TryGetValue&amp;#40;ecsb.ConnectionString, out workspace&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;                    workspace &amp;#61; CreateWrappedMetadataWorkspace&amp;#40;ecsb.Metadata, wrapperProviders&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                    metadataWorkspaceMemorizer.Add&amp;#40;ecsb.ConnectionString, workspace&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;                &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you could update the NuGet package with this fix it would be awesome. Thanks&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Louis&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>lpperras</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:23:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Multi-threaded application support [3] 20111103022312P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Issue with dynamic assemblies [2]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/2</link><description>You get an unhandled exception when you have dynamic assemblies built with Castle or any Mock unit testing system. In the file EntityConnectionWrapperUtils.cs, you should modify the line 188 to verify for dynamic assemblies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ex&amp;#58; foreach &amp;#40;Assembly asm in assembliesToConsider.Where&amp;#40;asm &amp;#61;&amp;#62; &amp;#33;IsEcmaAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; &amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;IsSystemAssembly&amp;#40;asm&amp;#41; &amp;#38;&amp;#38; &amp;#33;asm.IsDynamic&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It would be nice to see the NuGet package updated with this modification. Thanks&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Louis&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>lpperras</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:11:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Issue with dynamic assemblies [2] 20111103021150P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1]</title><link>http://efwrappers.codeplex.com/workitem/1</link><description>I can get it working with the EF 4.1 Database First DbContext T4 templates by adding this constructor&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    public abstract class MyDbContext &amp;#58; DbContext&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;        protected MyDbContext&amp;#40;string nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#58; base&amp;#40;EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;nameOrConnectionString&amp;#41;, true&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#47;&amp;#47; enable sql tracing&lt;br /&gt;            &amp;#40;&amp;#40;IObjectContextAdapter&amp;#41; this&amp;#41;.ObjectContext.EnableTracing&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;        &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;    &amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;But it doesn&amp;#39;t work with Code First because EFTracingProviderUtils.CreateTracedEntityConnection&amp;#40;&amp;#41; requires an Entity ConnectionString, not a normal ConnectionString. Is it possible to use a normal &amp;#40;non-EF&amp;#41; ConnectionString&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;efwrappers.codeplex.com&amp;#47;discussions&amp;#47;262707 for the full thread.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>jrummell</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:23:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Support tracing for Code-First [1] 20110712082330P</guid></item></channel></rss>